xrf:start
Différences
Ci-dessous, les différences entre deux révisions de la page.
| Les deux révisions précédentesRévision précédenteProchaine révision | Révision précédente | ||
| xrf:start [2018/03/02 17:30] – zaragosi | xrf:start [2018/03/02 17:43] (Version actuelle) – zaragosi | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Ligne 1: | Ligne 1: | ||
| + | Source : Croudace, I.W., Rothwell, R.G. (Eds.), 2015. Micro-XRF Studies of Sediment Cores, Developments in Paleoenvironmental Research. Springer Netherlands, | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| ====Calcium (Ca)==== | ====Calcium (Ca)==== | ||
| ===Origin=== | ===Origin=== | ||
| Ligne 81: | Ligne 84: | ||
| ===Use=== | ===Use=== | ||
| Ca/Ca+Fe used by Eisele et al. (2008) to characterise three cores from cold-water coralcovered | Ca/Ca+Fe used by Eisele et al. (2008) to characterise three cores from cold-water coralcovered | ||
| - | mound (Galway mound), Porcupine Seabight, SW of Ireland. Ca and Fe amounted to | + | mound (Galway mound), Porcupine Seabight, SW of Ireland. Ca and Fe amounted to > 90% of all XRF counts, so Ca/Ca+Fe useful benchmark for Ca and Fe. Ca/Ca+Fe showed |
| - | > 90% of all XRF counts, so Ca/Ca+Fe useful benchmark for Ca and Fe. Ca/Ca+Fe showed | + | |
| very similar patterns in all three cores allowing correlation and lithostratigraphic subdivision | very similar patterns in all three cores allowing correlation and lithostratigraphic subdivision | ||
| ===Applications and literature=== | ===Applications and literature=== | ||
xrf/start.1520008257.txt.gz · Dernière modification : de zaragosi
